If you are going to debate educational practices, why in the world would you pick Michelle Rhee to appear? She did such a wonderful job in Washington that she was practically chased out of town. Pick someone that is actually respected by the people who actually know what the problems are, the teachers. Despite what many think, education can't be run like a business in the public school system. In our area, charters draw the students, then as soon as the "official" body count is taken in the fall (the one that determines the money for students), they are "withdrawn", usually because the charter "just can't help them" for whatever reason. Then the student reappears at the public school, which now has NO choice about taking this kid back, but now does not receive ANY money for this student all year. The money is kept by the charter school. Anyone that thinks there isn't something wrong with this must be making money from it, because there is no logic to it at all.
May 24, 2012 at 7:35 pm |
Lisa
I agree. Smaller classrooms are not the key. Quality teachers are key. A larger classroom with a great teacher would be preferred.
Your daily destination for political news. Join John each night as he pulls back the curtain on Washington, cuts through the partisan noise, and gets to the bottom of stories that affect you.
John King, USA aired weekdays at 6pm ET. The final show aired June 29, 2012.
Any questions for John? Tweet them to @JohnKingCNN and he'll answer them Tuesday's at noon ET on CNN.com/LIVE
If you are going to debate educational practices, why in the world would you pick Michelle Rhee to appear? She did such a wonderful job in Washington that she was practically chased out of town. Pick someone that is actually respected by the people who actually know what the problems are, the teachers. Despite what many think, education can't be run like a business in the public school system. In our area, charters draw the students, then as soon as the "official" body count is taken in the fall (the one that determines the money for students), they are "withdrawn", usually because the charter "just can't help them" for whatever reason. Then the student reappears at the public school, which now has NO choice about taking this kid back, but now does not receive ANY money for this student all year. The money is kept by the charter school. Anyone that thinks there isn't something wrong with this must be making money from it, because there is no logic to it at all.
I agree. Smaller classrooms are not the key. Quality teachers are key. A larger classroom with a great teacher would be preferred.